Must reading
Costa Rica
BEACH%20images.jpg Please contact me for trusted medical and real estate referrals usprofit(at)tampabay.rr.com
Please click here
Military Blogs
More Blogs
This area does not yet contain any content.
This area does not yet contain any content.
  • Guilty: Liberal
    Guilty: Liberal "Victims" and Their Assault on America
    by Ann Coulter
  • Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies
    Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies
    by Jared Diamond
  • Catastrophe
    Catastrophe
    by Dick Morris, Eileen McGann
  • The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
    The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off

MATT DRUDGE
3 AM GIRLS
CINDY ADAMS
MARC AMBINDER
KURT ANDERSEN
JONATHAN ALTER
ARMY ARCHERD
BAZ BAMIGBOYE
DAVE BARRY
PETER BART
STEPHEN BATTAGLIO
BIZARRE [SUN]
GLORIA BORGER
BRENT BOZELL
DAVID BRODER
DAVID BROOKS
PAT BUCHANAN
HOWIE CARR
MONA CHAREN
ELEANOR CLIFT
RICHARD COHEN
JOE CONASON
DAVID CORN
ANN COULTER
JIM CRAMER
CRAIG CRAWFORD
STANLEY CROUCH
LOU DOBBS
DE BORCHGRAVE
MAUREEN DOWD
STEVE DUNLEAVY
ROGER EBERT
LARRY ELDER
SUSAN ESTRICH
JOSEPH FARAH
SUZANNE FIELDS
HOWARD FINEMAN
NIKKI FINKE
FIRST DRAFT [REUTERS]
FISHBOWL, DC
FISHBOWL, NYC
ROGER FRIEDMAN
JOHN FUND
LEAH GARCHIK
GATECRASHER
BILL GERTZ
GEORGIE GEYER
JIM GLASSMAN
JONAH GOLDBERG
ELLEN GOODMAN
MARTIN GROVE
MARK HALPERIN
CARL HIAASEN
NAT HENTOFF
PEREZ HILTON
CHRISTOPHER HITCHENS
HUGH HEWITT
INSIDE BELTWAY
INSIDE POLITICS
INSIDE THE RING
AL KAMEN
MICKEY KAUS
KEITH J. KELLY
MICHAEL KINSLEY
JOE KLEIN
HARRY KNOWLES
KRAUTHAMMER
NICHOLAS KRISTOF
PAUL KRUGMAN
LARRY KUDLOW
HOWIE KURTZ
JOHN LEO
DAVID LIMBAUGH
RUSH LIMBAUGH
HAL LINDSEY
RICH LOWRY
MICHELLE MALKIN
DICK MORRIS
PEGGY NOONAN
BOB NOVAK
OFF THE RECORD
MARVIN OLASKY
BILL O'REILLY
PAGE SIX
CAMILLE PAGLIA
ANDREA PEYSER
JIM PINKERTON
BILL PRESS
WES PRUDEN
ANNA QUINDLEN
FRANK RICH
REX REED
RICHARD REEVES
RELIABLE SOURCE
RICHARD ROEPER
RUSH/MOLLOY
SCHLAFLY
TOM SHALES
LIZ SMITH
MICHAEL SNEED
JOE SOBRAN
THOMAS SOWELL
MARK STEYN
ANDREW SULLIVAN
HELEN THOMAS
CAL THOMAS
TV COLUMN
TV NEWSER
TV PROGRAMMING INSIDER
VEGAS CONFIDENTIAL
JEFFREY WELLS
WASHINGTON WHISPERS
GEORGE WILL
WALTER WILLIAMS
JAMES WOLCOTT
MORT ZUCKERMAN
BILL ZWECKER

Add to Technorati Favorites
Internet Marketing
This area does not yet contain any content.
Powered by Squarespace
No RSS feeds have been linked to this section.
No website changes have been recorded.
Add to Technorati Favorites
This area does not yet contain any content.

MATT DRUDGE
3 AM GIRLS
CINDY ADAMS
MARC AMBINDER
KURT ANDERSEN
JONATHAN ALTER
ARMY ARCHERD
BAZ BAMIGBOYE
DAVE BARRY
PETER BART
STEPHEN BATTAGLIO
BIZARRE [SUN]
GLORIA BORGER
BRENT BOZELL
DAVID BRODER
DAVID BROOKS
PAT BUCHANAN
HOWIE CARR
MONA CHAREN
ELEANOR CLIFT
RICHARD COHEN
JOE CONASON
DAVID CORN
ANN COULTER
JIM CRAMER
CRAIG CRAWFORD
STANLEY CROUCH
LOU DOBBS
DE BORCHGRAVE
MAUREEN DOWD
STEVE DUNLEAVY
ROGER EBERT
LARRY ELDER
SUSAN ESTRICH
JOSEPH FARAH
SUZANNE FIELDS
HOWARD FINEMAN
NIKKI FINKE
FIRST DRAFT [REUTERS]
FISHBOWL, DC
FISHBOWL, NYC
ROGER FRIEDMAN
JOHN FUND
LEAH GARCHIK
GATECRASHER
BILL GERTZ
GEORGIE GEYER
JIM GLASSMAN
JONAH GOLDBERG
ELLEN GOODMAN
MARTIN GROVE
MARK HALPERIN
CARL HIAASEN
NAT HENTOFF
PEREZ HILTON
CHRISTOPHER HITCHENS
HUGH HEWITT
INSIDE BELTWAY
INSIDE POLITICS
INSIDE THE RING
AL KAMEN
MICKEY KAUS
KEITH J. KELLY
MICHAEL KINSLEY
JOE KLEIN
HARRY KNOWLES
KRAUTHAMMER
NICHOLAS KRISTOF
PAUL KRUGMAN
LARRY KUDLOW
HOWIE KURTZ
JOHN LEO
DAVID LIMBAUGH
RUSH LIMBAUGH
HAL LINDSEY
RICH LOWRY
MICHELLE MALKIN
DICK MORRIS
PEGGY NOONAN
BOB NOVAK
OFF THE RECORD
MARVIN OLASKY
BILL O'REILLY
PAGE SIX
CAMILLE PAGLIA
ANDREA PEYSER
JIM PINKERTON
BILL PRESS
WES PRUDEN
ANNA QUINDLEN
FRANK RICH
REX REED
RICHARD REEVES
RELIABLE SOURCE
RICHARD ROEPER
RUSH/MOLLOY
SCHLAFLY
TOM SHALES
LIZ SMITH
MICHAEL SNEED
JOE SOBRAN
THOMAS SOWELL
MARK STEYN
ANDREW SULLIVAN
HELEN THOMAS
CAL THOMAS
TV COLUMN
TV NEWSER
TV PROGRAMMING INSIDER
VEGAS CONFIDENTIAL
JEFFREY WELLS
WASHINGTON WHISPERS
GEORGE WILL
WALTER WILLIAMS
JAMES WOLCOTT
MORT ZUCKERMAN
BILL ZWECKER

This area does not yet contain any content.
HOT !
Internet Marketing
Thursday
01Jul

Former Ebay CEO Meg Whitmans EBAY sells Pedophile toys !!! Outrage to sink Republican ?Seller active since 02 PLEASE NOTE BALD PRIVATE PARTS EDITED BY ME ITS MUCH WORSE ON EBAY ! note we broke this story july 2 ,2009 date is forward set to hold top place in our blog 

   

Foam Japanese Love Doll Yohko concealed vagina type

Item number: 300326135238
You are signed in Watch this itemin My eBay
 This item has been added to My eBay for Guests.
As a guest, you can:
 Track up to 10 items on this computer in My eBay
 Receive an email reminder for this item a few hours before it ends
 
Foam Japanese Love Doll Yohko concealed vagina type
View larger picture
Starting bid: US $459.99  
Your maximum bid:
US $
  (Enter US $459.99 or more)
  Make no payments for 3 months on this purchase - eBay MasterCard

End time: Jul-05-0905:25:18 PDT (2 days 13 hours)
Shipping: US $91.50
US Postal Service First Class Mail®
Service to United States
(moreservices)
Ships to: United States, Canada
Item location: Tokyo, Japan
History: 0 bids

You can also:
  Bid with Bid Assistant
Get SMS or IM alerts | Email to a friend
Listing and payment details: Show
 
Starting time: Jun-28-0905:25:18 PDT
Starting bid: US $459.99
Duration: 7-day listing
Payment methods:
PayPal (preferred),
Personal check,
Money order/Cashiers check
See details
   
Meet the seller
Seller: modern-count( 545Feedback score is 500 to 999) Member is a PowerSeller
Feedback: 99.6 % Positive
Member: since Jun-14-02 in United States
See detailed feedback
Ask seller a question
Add to Favorite Sellers
View seller's other items

Buy safely
1. Check the seller's reputation
  Score: 545|99.6% Positive
See detailed feedback
2. Check how you're protected
 
 
Description  
 
By bidding on this auction you are stating
that you are over 18/(21 in some areas)
and allowed to possess this item in your area.
Notice: We sell only high quality brand new merchandise, unless noted otherwise.
Life-Like Japanese Love Doll Yuuko


This spectacular love doll is made from the revolutionary material, Silica-Urethane (Urethane Foam Rubber). It feels surprisingly almost like real skin! It is better and lighter than silicone. The softness of the Urethane foam is almost same as the soft type bread. The surface looks like human skin, having bread-like foam inside. Millions of bubbles inside the entire body makes the doll soft so that the user feels just like he embraces a woman's actual body. Certain numbers of the bubbles appears on the surface (just like breads). The user will feel it "warm" because the material reflects the user's body temperature.

The doll has a tight and soft concealed type vaginal entry (5" long) for your pleasure play.


Although the doll arrives with the eyes are closed, the eyeball set can be purchased for additional charge before the delivery.

The limbs of the doll are flexible, but not posable. They can't stay in one position without support.

Some reports indicate that there are many users who enjoyed having our dolls for over 10 years.

This doll is made in Japan and shipped straight from the manufacturer.

Delivery is made by EMS (Express Mail Service) Japan. It usually takes 5-6 days.


Available in 2 variations
Standard Set:
(listed on this auction)

  • shaven pubic area
  • vaginal insert
  • sexy panty
  • lube
  • make-up set
  • Orient Black long hair type Wig

Deluxe Set:

  • Sexy panty
  • vaginal insert
  • lube
  • make-up set
  • Orient Black long hair type Wig
  • Sailor uniform


    Medium, Black / Long, Black / Contemporary, Black / Long, Blond / Short, Blond
    You may select any of these wigs for the doll or purchase extra
    (Long , Black comes with the doll)



    Measurements:

  • Height: 4’2”/130 cm
  • Weight: 6.6 lbs/3 kg
  • Doll measurements: chest/waist/hips - 24.5" x 22.2" x 25.3"/ 63 x 52 x 65 cm
  • Package: 9.8” x 9.4” x 4’6”/ 25 x 24 x 141cm



We have more images on our website.

We accept PayPal, Cashier Checks, Money Orders and Personal Checks (please expect to wait a few days from a day we receive your personal check). All sales final.

Bidder is responsible for shipping & handling charge of $90.50 for all contiguous US States. All others, please add $6.00

Return policy:

When you receive your package before opening the wrapping please identify whether it is the correct item(s). Then if it is an item you ordered, inspect it for missing or damaged parts without using it intimately if possible. If anything is wrong, please contact us ASAP.

If your item is clearly damaged or/and can't be turned on or defective in other way, you might be able to receive a replacement. We will need to inspect the item ourselves first.

However, in no case we can accept USED items back in this, Adult Only category.

Please remember this!

We do not have telephone customer support.
Please direct all your questions, comments, concerns, etc. to our email for 7 days support.
service@moderncount.com

Please make sure that your email server is not blocking our emails.







00105
Shipping and handling
Ships to
United States, Canada

Country:
Shipping and HandlingTo ServiceInsurance
US $91.50 United States US Postal Service First Class Mail® Estimated delivery 4 - 7 business days after seller receives cleared payment US $5.00 Optional
US $100.00 Canada USPS Express Mail InternationalTM Estimated delivery 5 - 7 business days after seller receives cleared payment US $6.00 Optional

Country:
Shipping and HandlingToServiceInsurance
US $91.50 United States US Postal Service First Class Mail® Estimated delivery 4 - 7 business days after seller receives cleared payment US $5.00 Optional
*Sellers are not responsible for service transit time. This information is provided by the carrier and excludes weekends and holidays. Note that transit times may vary, particularly during peak periods.
Domestic handling time
Will usually ship within 2 business days of receiving cleared payment.
Sales tax
Seller charges sales tax for items shipped to: PA (6.000%).
Return policy
The seller will not accept returns for this item.
Payment details
Payment method Preferred/Accepted Buyer protection on eBay
Credit or debit card through PayPal
Seller Preferred
Money order/Cashiers check
Accepted
This item is not covered by Buyer Protection with PayPal
Personal check
Accepted
This item is not covered by Buyer Protection with PayPal
Learn about payment methods Seller's payment instructions
We accept PayPal, Cashiers check, Money order and personal checks. Wait for detailed instructions with your invoice. Will usually ship within 5 business days of receiving cleared payment. All sales final. Return policy: When you receive your package please inspect it for missing or damaged parts without using it intimately if possible. If anything is wrong contact us ASAP. 
Help Take action on this item Item title: Foam Japanese Love Doll Yohko concealed vagina type
 
Place a bid
Starting bid: US $459.99
Your maximum bid:
US $
(Enter US $459.99or more)
  You will confirm in the next step.

eBay automatically bids on your behalf up to your maximum bid. Learn about bidding.
 

This is a private listing. Your identity will not be disclosed to anyone except for the seller.


 
Other options
Go backBack to list of items|Report this item|Printer Version| Sell one like this

Seller assumes all responsibility for listing this item.

eBay Pulse | eBay Reviews | eBay Stores | Reseller Marketplace | Austria | France | Germany | Italy | Spain | United Kingdom | Popular Searches | New Pulse
Half.com | Tickets | Kijiji | PayPal | ProStores | Apartments for Rent | Shopping.com | Skype


About eBay | Announcements | Security Center | Resolution Center | eBay Toolbar | Policies | Government Relations | Site Map | Help
 
 
 
Copyright © 1995-2009 eBay Inc. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the eBay User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Wednesday
20Jan

My source reveals this sickness happened under Whitmans rein

Sunday
01Nov

Ecopower 4 a revolution ! I found a company called EcoTrust Energy that has the Power Company worried


www.ecotrustenergy.com/scottmathieu

Call 352-688-7269 24/7 for a free DVD

PowerwoRx-e3 is a new product which provides a Whole House Energy System for the best possible energy savings and protection based upon a unique technology that provides three key benefits:

1. Energy Savings

2. Equipment Protection

3. Electrical Noise Filtration

www.ecotrustenergy.com/scottmathieu

1. Energy Savings

Ecopower is an amazing new product which provides energy savings by reducing the amount of power drawn from your utility with the use of specially designed harmonic resistant capacitors. Our systems optimize your home's power factor thus reducing the amount of energy your homes motor loads use such as air conditioners, refrigerators, freezers, washers, dryers, dishwashers, pool pumps, vacuum cleaners, furnace blower motors, fans, etc. Motor loads require more energy to do their work compared to other electrical equipment in your home. The Ecopower 4 "power factor optimization" significantly increases the efficiency of your motor load and stores waste energy resulting in decreased demand and usage of electricity from your utility company. This equates to significant cost savings for you the home owner.

Power factor is the measurement of how efficient your electrical system is using the energy delivered to your home from your utility company. For example, your stove and dryer heating coils and incadescent light bulbs have a "power factor rating" of unity or 1. This equipment converts electric energy to heat and light. Motor loads as described above can have"power factor ratings" as low as .2. This combination of electric loads in American homes results in an average "power facotr rating" of .77 or less. the .77 indicates that your home is using more energy than it should to operate your electrical equipment. The PowerwoRx e3 technology has a proven track record of increasing a home's "power factor rating" to .95 or better.

2.Equipment Protection

Ecopower 4 technology provides Surge and Spike Suppression, a feature that will help protect and extend the useful life of your electrical equipment. Voltage surges and spikes come from many different internal and external sources such as utility grid changes, damaged transformers or electrical lines due to accidents or acts of God, old or out dated utility transformers that supply electrical power to your home, lightning and turning on and off major motor loads in your home.

Typical homes in the United States are bombarded with literally hundreds of surges and spikes a day that damage sensitive electrical equipment over time. A combination of the Ecopower 4 harmonic resistant capacitors and metal oxide varistors (MOV's) give the home owner the maximum protection available on the market today. The external lights on the Ecopower 4 system provide an easy visual indicator that the system is protecting your home.

3. Electrical Noise Filtration

Ecopower 4 technology provides Harmonic Filtration which has become more important since the 1980's and almost mandatory going into the 21st Century due to the proliferation of computers, fax and copy machines and variable frequency drives which are know as "nonlinear loads". "Nonlinear loads" ask for and use electrical current in "pulses" unlike traditional electrical equipment.

This pulse use of electrical current creates damaging noise, interference and heat on today's electrical systems causing interference within sensitive electrical equipment or worse causing them to overheat and fail. The use of computerized electronics within the American home has been growing at exponential rates and the need for filtering out the interference, noise and heat created by nonlinear loads has never been greater.

How Would This Help the Environment?

Please listen to our recorded conference from the phone.

Dial -231 644 8099

Enter Access Code - 890692 #

www.ecotrustenergy.com/scottmathieu

Installing the Ecopower 4 system in your home will reduce the need to produce electrical energy reducing the amount of coal and oil being burned to generate the electric energy, resulting in the reduction of environmentally harmful emissions of carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide and sulfur dioxide.

If 500,000 homes across the country installed Ecopower 4 systems this would reduce the need to generate 17 megawatts of electricity: saving 42,250 tons of coal or 231,500 barrels of oil and reducing by 98,250 tons of carbon dioxide, 42,000 pounds of nitrous oxide and 221,500 pounds of sulfur dioxide of annual greenhouse emissions.

click here to learn more www.ecotrustenergy.com/scottmathieu

How many motors are in your home ?

motorized attic access stairs computer
roof top (attic exhaust) fans modems
attic ventilator printer
furnace blower fax machine
air conditioner &
air conditioner compressor (outdoors)
copier, laminator
air handler (indoors) paper shredder
baseboard (hydronic) heat circulating pumps pencil sharpener, electric engraving tool
re-circulation pump for hot water electric clocks
window air conditioner air purifiers
dehumidifier or humidifier air filters
space heater garage door opener
ceiling fan well pump, sump pump,
oscillating fans and other types of fans landscape pond & water feature pumps
fireplace blower generator
power vented water heaters air compressor
bathroom fan/ventilator Sleep number bed air pump
whirlpool tub or hot tub adjustable bed
swimming pool pump electric power tools such as saws, drills,
routers, sanders, paint sprayer, etc
vacuum sweeper, carpet scrubber
floor scrubber and polisher
gardening tools such as hedge trimmers, leaf
blower, electric chain saw, etc
electric broom hair dryer
washer electric toothbrush
dryer electric massager, electric massage chair
refrigerator/freezer shaver, clipper
dishwasher exercise equipment-treadmill, stair climber
range hood medical and handicapped care devices
– motorized hospital bed, lift, etc.
microwave (turntable and fan) DVD/CD/VCR player, turntables
trash compactor TV- cooling fan motor
garbage disposal satellite dish positioning motor
blender, food processor, food mixer, meat
slicer, grinder, vacuum-sealer,
motorized children’s toys
flour mill, grain mill, juicer, dehydrater
can opener, carving knife

Saturday
04Jul

Bruce Wills new film Surrogates

Saturday
04Jul

Hussein Obama’s NO HOPE Economy

Welcome to the 'Hope' Economy

 

by David Harsanyi TownHall.com 7-4-9

 

After being asked when the public should begin judging the success of the nearly $800 billion stimulus plan, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs answered, "I think we should begin to judge it now."

Let's take his advice.

The administration warned that if we failed to support a stimulus package, unemployment would hit a dire 9 percent by 2010. With the stimulus, unemployment, it claimed, would stay in the 8 percent range.

This week, the Labor Department announced that the jobless rate jumped to 9.5 percent, higher than it's been anytime since August 1983.

It's not as if the administration was close. As The New York Times notes: "The difference between the situation that the Obama advisers predicted and the one that has come to pass is about 2.5 million jobs. It's as if every worker in the city of Los Angeles received an unexpected layoff notice."

Don't get too dejected, though. We still have an economic plan with a heaping dose of hope. Surely, you'll feel better when the president begins doling out his two-pronged faith-based explanation -- and if we're lucky, he'll do it at a "town hall" meeting with approximately 100 of his closest friends.

First, you always should assume things could have been worse.

This leap of faith involves buying the "save-and-created-jobs" myth the president likes to peddle. And if you're lucky enough to be working on some state-run boondoggle awash in freshly printed money, smile. As for the rest of America, we once again learn that government spending rarely spurs wider economic prosperity.

But let's, for argument's sake, make believe that the stimulus plan has saved or created 150,000 jobs.

By the end of June, $53 billion in stimulus funding had been spent on weatherizing projects, bridges for rodents and checks for 10,000 formerly living Americans. (This administration doesn't only create jobs; it creates life.) That puts the cost of each job saved at about $354,000, or exactly the sort of efficiency you expect from D.C.

The "things-could-have-been-worse" argument is nothing new, and neither is the second line of defense: Blame capitalism.

So let's also pretend, for the moment, that an era of widespread deregulation spurred a global recession. What exactly has Obama done to mitigate it?

Instead of exerting his extraordinary political capital to bolster American business, the president was busy targeting the investor class; instead of easing the burden on the middle class, Obama radically increased spending and debt; instead of encouraging market innovation, Washington has bolstered the status quo by bailing out antiquated, poorly run industries and crowding out small businesses.

Obama now urges Americans to be patient on the stimulus package. Yet at the same time, the president exhibits a decisive lack of patience as he sprints forward with generational tax increases, in both cap and trade policy and a trillion-dollar-plus health care "reform."

Not surprisingly, many polls illustrate an increasing skepticism regarding the stimulus package and a growing distrust of Washington's unparalleled meddling in the economy. According to a June Rasmussen poll, a plurality of Americans now want government stimulus spending to be canceled.

This rising unease did not stop White House counselor David Axelrod from recently declaring that a second stimulus might be needed.

Needed to do what, one wonders? "Save and create" another 150,000 imaginary jobs?

One day, we will emerge from recession; we always do. And on that day, Obama almost certainly will take credit.

But one wonders: When will the glorious "new era of responsibility" ever actually kick in?

After all, as of right now, judging solely from the administration's very own promises and timeline, we are left with nothing to show for an irresponsible spending binge.

 

 

Saturday
04Jul

Hussein Obama’s BIG Government

Government Growth Challenging Liberty this July 4th

 

by Carrie Lukas TownHall.com 7-4-9

 

Millions of American women are busy with July 4th preparations. They are dusting off picnic blankets, preparing potato salad, and making arrangements with friends and family for firework displays. Few have time to thinking about the meaning of our country's founding and how events today may change our country in important ways.

As any school child could tell you, our founders rebelled because they wanted to escape a too-intrusive government. Since then, we have allowed government to expand in ways the founders never contemplated. Presently, our government is expanding once again. American women should consider what that means for their families and our basic rights and liberties.

Federal spending has soared this past year. While it's justified as necessary to stimulate a flagging economy, it's worth asking why our government grew so big even before the banking and housing crisis hit. For decades, the federal government has spent nearly one of every five dollars in the economy. This year, it will climb to about one in four. To support this spending, the government is issuing trillions of dollars of new debt. They claim it's necessary to solve today's problems. But what about tomorrow's?

We are constrained today because our government is already so large and over-extended. That problem will only get worse. Due to promises the government has already made—most specifically spending on Social Security and Medicare—the share of the economy that government will demand is going to continue to balloon.

This isn't just a matter of dollars and cents. This means that your children and grandchildren will have less control over the money they earn and their property because they will have to pay off liabilities accrued this year. That generation will have less to meet global challenges and each family will have less to meet personal ones.

Government is also taking over important aspects of what was once considered private life. Today Congress debates how to reconfigure the healthcare system. We should all ask why we should expect, or want, government to be so involved in this critical aspect of society.

Government health programs are sold as providing access to medical care, but they also restrict access. The rules that govern Medicare discourage doctors from taking on elderly patients. Government health programs guide doctors away from some treatments, and steer them toward others. And, we know from other countries with government-run health systems, that if we go the route of a “public option” for health insurance, such rationing will get worse.

Many have applauded the new law that gives government more leeway to regulate cigarettes. Most mothers instinctively celebrate anything that promises to help keep their children from smoking. Economists and policymakers will debate if efforts to restrict access to cigarettes actually results in more healthy behavior: will kids really smoke less or will it encourage a black market, introducing kids to more dangerous people and products? That empirical question is important, but there's something more fundamental: Isn't it really our jobs, as parents, to discourage our children from smoking? Where does the role of government as parent end?

Such government action is often justified as necessary to promote good health and protect taxpayers since government picks up so much of the health care tab. Thus one expansion of government leads to another.

Once we accept that logic, why should government stop there? There are numerous behaviors that create public health costs, from eating fattening foods and drinking sugary drinks, to driving, hang gliding, playing football, sunbathing and having sex outside of marriage. Should government discourage these behaviors? Many will look at the list and find one that they think justifies government action and then shake their heads that it's absurd for government to be involved in the others.

But our heads shake at different things. The founders knew that. That's why they sought to limit government and leave the vast majority of decisions to individuals. Individuals were supposed to keep nearly all of their property so that they could provide for their own healthcare and houses, take care of their children, and pursue their idea of happiness free of government interference. That faith in the individual is the core of our country. It's worth celebrating—and preserving—today

 

 

 

Saturday
04Jul

Hussein Obama’s Census Big Fix

The Big Fix: Rigged, Illegal, Racial, and Intrusive

Obama’s census will forever change the course and complexion of modern America

By Dr. Paul L. Williams CanadaFreePress.com 7-4-9

 

Strike One

In violation of Article 1, Section 2, of the U.S. Constitution, President Barack Obama has assumed complete control of the 2010 Census.

This Article, which concerns the legislative rather than executive branch of government, stipulates that the “enumeration” be conducted by a commerce official under the supervision of the Senate and the House of Representations. It reads:

Representation and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers ... . The actual Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they (the House of Representatives and the Senate) shall by Law direct.

When the Oval Office side-stepped this stipulation, Senator Judd Greg, who was then Mr. Obama’s choice as Secretary of Commerce, announced his withdrawal from consideration.

“This was simply a bridge too far for me,” Mr. Greg said.

Strike Two.

In violation of Title 8 Section 1325 of the U.S. Code, Mr. Obama has ordered federal border patrol officials to scale down enforcement so that the Census will be artificially swollen by the influx of millions of illegal Latinos.

Defending Mr. Obama’s illegal directive, Deputy Census Director Preston Jay Waite told the press that raids on illegals occurred during the population count would make a “distrustful group” less likely to cooperate with government workers who are supposed to obtain an accurate head count of the people living in the U.S.

Strike Three.

Mr. Obama has adopted a further means to guarantee the outcome so that the redistribution will serve his agenda.

A whopping $14 billion has been set aside for the Census.

With this money, Mr. Obama has obtained the services of “Census partners” - - organizations that will assist the Commerce department in the head count.

A lion’s share of the $14 billion has been set aside for a “community-based” organization that specializes in fraud and deceptive practices.

Why would Mr. Obama go to such extremes for the sake of the Census?

The answer is simple.

The tally will re-chart the political map of the country.

It will determine which states gain seats in Congress and which ones lose them.

It will divert billions in federal funds to states and cities with the greatest number of illegal aliens.

And it will forever change the racial composition of the home of the free and the land of the brave.

Dr. Paul L. Williams Most recent columns

Paul L. Williams, Ph.D., is the author of such best-selling books as The Day of Islam, The Al Qaeda Connection, Osama’s Revenge: The Next 9/11, The Complete Idiot’s Guide to the Crusades and The Vatican Exposed. An award-winning journalist, he is a frequent guest on such national news networks as ABC News, CBS News, Fox News, MSNBC, and NPR. Williams operates from his blog thelastcrusade.org

 

 

Saturday
04Jul

Hussein Obama’s Socialism

Warning: American Gestapo ahead

Henry Lanb WorldNetDaily.com 7-4-9

Every July 4, we retreat to fireworks, feast and festival in celebration of an independence that is rapidly becoming little more than a memory. Our ancestors declared their independence in 1776 from a tyrannical, overbearing government. The independence claimed by the authors of the U.S. Constitution helped them create a government expressly prohibited from becoming tyrannical and overbearing, by limiting its power to certain enumerated responsibilities. Those limitations have long been ignored, and the current government makes no apology for its overbearing tyranny.

Just as American independence was foreshadowed by a tea party in Boston, America's new independence is foreshadowed by tea parties across the nation. There is more evidence that a new declaration is being drafted. Currently, 36 states have approved or are considering some form of state sovereignty resolution. Several states are following Montana's example, enacting laws that defy federal intervention. More than a dozen states have enacted or are considering legislation that prohibits the federal government from imposing a mandatory National Animal Identification System. These are symptoms of a society that is dissatisfied with the long train of abuses government continues to inflict upon it.

As the modern-day freedom fighters begin to organize and strategize, the government chooses not to reform, but to entrench and expand its control over the people.

The similarity is remarkable, between the rise of the Democratic Socialist Party now in control of Washington and the rise of the National Socialist Workers Party of Germany in the 1930s.

Are we headed for a Nazi-style totalitarian abyss? Find out in "Defeating the Totalitarian Lie: A Former Hitler Youth Warns America"

Led by an articulate orator, the German government set out to nationalize health care, transportation, manufacturing and law enforcement. The Obama government has set out to nationalize manufacturing of autos and the finance industry. The Obama-backed "cap and trade" legislation will effectively nationalize the energy and transportation industries. And Obama's nationalized health care program is on the front burner.

Now here's another similarity: nationalization of law enforcement. H.R. 675, sponsored by Democrat Rep. Bob Filner, was introduced to:

Provide police officers, criminal investigators, and game law enforcement officers of the Department of Defense with the authority to execute warrants, make arrests, and carry firearms. (Emphasis added.)

Why do employees of the Department of Defense need the authority to execute warrants, make arrests and carry firearms? When the bill was introduced, Filner said: "We need to ensure that federal, state and local law enforcement are able to work together to apprehend criminals and to prevent and solve crimes."

The 1878 Posse Comitatus Act explicitly prohibits the Department of Defense from involvement in state and local law enforcement activities. The feds have the FBI to investigate federal crimes and the Justice Department to prosecute federal crimes. Waco and Ruby Ridge are good examples of federal law enforcement. And the land management agencies have gun-totin' enforcement officers to prevent tourists from picking up arrowheads on federal property. Why do we need to authorize the secretary of defense to arm another domestic police force?

Take a clue from the authorities granted by the bill:

  • To execute and serve warrants;
  • To make arrests without warrants;
  • To carry firearms;
  • To enforce federal laws enacted to protect persons or property;
  • To prevent breaches of the peace and suppress affrays or unlawful assemblies. ...

There are other authorities, but let's focus on this last one: "To prevent breaches of the peace and suppress affrays or unlawful assemblies." What is an unlawful assembly? Any assembly that is not authorized by government is unlawful. Should an irate society decide to hold a tea party even if government refused to authorize it, then there must be a reliable federal law enforcement army to "suppress" the unlawful assembly. Local police cannot be trusted to "suppress" an assembly of their neighbors.

In Germany, this police force was called the Gestapo. In Germany, the people who resisted the nationalization of anything were immediately branded as "right-wing extremist" and denounced and ridiculed by government officials and by the press. Watch the government and press response to the April tea parties.

These people who assemble peacefully to protest government policies are described as "Astroturf" pawns of corporate interests by Speaker Pelosi, and as "ignorant rednecks" by Janeane Garofalo. Assemblies such as these were outlawed in 1930s Germany. They can be outlawed, and are being outlawed or otherwise prevented, in this country today.

The July 4 Atlanta tea party scheduled since March was abruptly canceled June 18 when a major donor to the Democratic Socialist Party now in control of Washington exerted sufficient influence to have permission to use the property withdrawn.

Americans can't comprehend the possibility that the federal government could ever become as oppressive as Germany in the 1930s. Think again. How many bills are now floating around that seek to either register guns or outlaw them completely? This was one of the first objectives of the 1930s German government. Once the guns were registered, the Gestapo knew exactly where to go to confiscate them.

Is this why the Democrats in Washington now want to create a federal domestic police force?

Independence and individual freedom are not virtues to Democratic Socialists; but government control is.

 

 

 

Saturday
04Jul

Pastor a Christian Criminal, Gays Protected

Holder: 'Gays' protected, ministers not


Attorney general's testimony on 'hate crimes'

By Bob Unruh WorldNetDaily.com 7-4-9

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder says a homosexual activist who is attacked following a Christian minister's sermon about homosexuality would be protected by a proposed new federal law, but a minister attacked by a homosexual wouldn't be.

The revelations come from Holder's recent testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, which was taking comments on the so-called "hate crimes" proposal. It also was the subject of discussion on talk radio icon Rush Limbaugh's show today.

"This is the question," Limbaugh said. "[Sen.] Jeff Sessions [R-Ala.] presents a hypothetical where a minister gives a sermon, quotes the Bible about homosexuality and is thereafter attacked ... by a gay activist because of what the minister said about his religious beliefs and what Scripture says about homosexuality. Is the minister protected?"

No, said Holder.

"Well, the statute would not – would not necessarily cover that. We're talking about crimes that have a historic basis. Groups who have been targeted for violence as a result of the color of their skin, their sexual orientation, that is what this statute tends – is designed to cover. We don't have the indication that the attack was motivated by a person's desire to strike at somebody who was in one of these protected groups. That would not be covered by the statute," Holder stated.

Continued Limbaugh, "In other words: ministers and whites are not covered by the hate crime statute because we're talking about crimes that have a historic basis, groups who have been targeted for violence as a result of their skin color, sexual orientation. So hate crimes are reserved exclusively for blacks and homosexuals. Everybody else can get to the back of the bus on this one. "

Holder also fumbled repeatedly in searching for answers to questions from several of the senators. He repeatedly failed to cite cases when asked to by senators that in recent years have been "improperly prosecuted," a video reveals.

The recent hearing, featuring Holder as the principal witness, was more than two hours long and is posted online by the committee.

On the VDARE blog, Patrick Cleburne wrote about what he called "Holder's chilling blunders."

"Holder attempted to justify passage of the Matthew Shephard Hate Crimes Prevention Act. Instead, he worked against it. Holder emphatically said most Americans are not given equal protection with homosexuals (and homosexual pedophiles) by the hate bill. Holder also presented no evidence that states are failing to prosecute hate crimes and need big government to get involved!

Here's the outline of why Christians are being silenced across America. Get it now!

"This is a desperately serious matter. With a politicized judiciary, who knows where it will go?" Clenburne continued.

Sessions was unchallenged in his assessment that the law, dubbed by opponents "The Pedophile Protection Act," would provide "special protections" for only some people in the United States. Holder confirmed that, identifying, blacks, homosexuals and others.

The hearing was on the "The Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009," for which a now-concluded special Fed Ex campaign to warn U.S. Senate members of the dangers of the "hate crimes" plan dispatched more than 705,000 letters to senators.

The letter-writing effort was organized by WND columnist Janet Porter, who also heads the Faith2Action Christian ministry. It allowed citizens to send individually addressed letters to all 100 senators over their own "signature" for only $10.95.

Joseph Farah, WND founder and editor, said, "We don't know of any campaign in history that can document more letters going to all U.S. senators than this one.

"If somebody knows of one, please tell me. Win or lose, this was a unique effort and certainly won't be the last of its kind," he said.

WND has also reported, the Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009 as it formally is known would provide special protections to homosexuals, essentially designating them as a "protected class." However, it could leave Christian ministers open to prosecution should their teachings be linked to any subsequent offense, by anyone, against a homosexual person.

It earned its nickname when Rep. Steve King suggested an amendment during its trek through the U.S. House that would specify pedophiles could not use the law to protect their activities.

Majority Democrats flatly refused.

Richard Land, of the Southern Baptist Convention, has said such a law – by definition – requires judges to determine what those accused of crimes were thinking.

"This could create a chilling effect on religious speech, connecting innocent expression of religious belief to acts of violence against individuals afforded special protections," he wrote. "The criminalization of religious speech, such as speech against the practice of homosexuality, has already been seen in other countries with similar hate crimes legislation in place."

Limbaugh has also warned his audience about the advancing threat of "hate crimes" laws.

"Some people are going to be put in jail for things that they say," he said. "Hate crime legislation. That's where they determine what's in your mind when you commit a crime. That's when they decide what you were thinking ... If you were thinking unapproved thoughts, that would make the crime you committed even worse."

President Obama, supported strongly during his campaign by homosexual advocates, has indicated that he would like to see the legislation become law.

"I urge members on both sides of the aisle to act on this important civil rights issue by passing this legislation to protect all of our citizens from violent acts of intolerance."

Under questioning from Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., Holder admitted that "hate" was involved in a recent case in which a Muslim man attacked and killed a U.S. soldier. Still, soldiers are not among the protected classes.

"There's a certain element of hate in that, I suppose," Holder admitted, leading Coburn to conclude, "What we're willing to do is elevate those crimes (verbal or physical attacks on homosexuals) over this very intended hate crime (a murder.)"

"There are lots of other groups, decent people who might need additional protection if the federal government had all the money in the world and the time to investigate," Sessions added.

Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, was specific, asking what crimes have developed that have not been addressed adequately by current laws and prosecutions.

Holder avoided a direct answer, saying, "Well, I have some in my prepared remarks."

Coburn tried again, "Do we have good stats telling us we're not (prosecuting) these crimes?"

"Do we have stats that states are failing? Which states are regularly or systematically failing to prosecute?"

"I don't think we can say there is a trend among the states or local jurisdictions for failing to go after these kinds of crimes," Holder admitted.

To other questions, Holder responded, "I don't know."

Sessions said, "I'll ask you again. Cite me some cases of significance that have not been properly prosecuted in the last five years."

Again, Holder deflected the question.

According Rick Scarborough of Vision America, voters should rise up en masse and contact their senators to oppose the plan.

Stephen Di Benedetto writing at Infozine, reported on a request from the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights that the senators reject the plan.

"I see little evidence that there is a trend among state law enforcement officials to ignore violent crimes motivated by prejudice," Hatch told Holder.

It was only in Holder's written statement where he cited cases where state's allegedly failed to prosecute cases to his satisfaction.

Coburn also noted the 45 states that have hate crime legislation. Only Arkansas, Georgia, South Carolina, Wyoming and Indiana do not. He asked of those five states are failing to prosecute hate crimes.

Holder said he did not have the information.

David Rittgers wrote on the Cato-at-Liberty website the hearing revealed "the dark underbelly of the Senate.

"The road to undermining the rule of law is being paved with the best of intentions and casual disregard (if not outright hostility) for the principles of limited government and equality under the law," he wrote.



 

Saturday
04Jul

Sick Muslim Behavior

Malaysia rejects Muslim convert to Christianity's request to be legally recognized as a Christian

Muslims attack fleeing Christians with acid


9 women, 4 children injured by rampage


WorldNetDaily.com
7-4-9

Muslims apparently angered because a Christian man driving a tractor reportedly tried to pass a Muslim on a motorcycle have rampaged in one village in Pakistan, destroying Christians' homes and throwing acid on women and children as they fled, according to a new report from Barnabas Aid.

The ministry reported that the violence this week happened in the village of Bahmani Walla in Punjab state in Pakistan, which is dominated by Islamic influences.

The report said 600 Muslims used gasoline bombs to vandalize 117 homes belonging to Christians – including 48 damaged by fire, and sabotage water pumps and cut electricity.

According to the report, the violence apparently stemmed from an incident one night earlier, "in which a Christian man driving a tractor requested that a Muslim man riding a motorcycle allow him to pass."

"The request was refused and a disagreement ensued," said the Christian ministry that directs financial support to projects that help Christians "where they suffer discrimination, oppression and persecution as a consequence of their faith."

Following the confrontation, news was spread among Muslims that there had been blasphemy against Islam, and it took only a few hours for a 600-strong mob of Muslims to assemble and begin the attack.

Cars and trucks owned by Christians were burned or stolen, jewelry and cash were taken and the next morning found Christian business owners facing a boycott.

"The most disturbing development was the throwing of acid at the Christians as they fled. At least nine women and four children have been injured," the Christian ministry reported.

While blasphemy carries a death penalty in Pakistan, there is no punishment available for making a false accusation that someone was guilty of the crime, the ministry said.

"Please pray for our Christian brothers and sisters in Bahmani Walla, who have suffered in this shocking attack, pray that the authorities will investigate thoroughly and bring to justice the perpetrators," said Patrick Sookhdeo, the international director for Barnabas Aid.

The organization also is accepting contributions to help some of the Christians deal with the needs of housing and food while their homes are restored and their lives re-assembled.

 

 

Saturday
04Jul

Killing for Allah

 

"I did it for Islam but it wasn't easy to kill people. We have to remember who they are though - they're deceitful people who are against the Islamic Revolution."

JihadWatch.com 7-3-9

A member of Iran's Basij militia feels a rumble of conscience and tries to rationalize it away. "Basij militiaman: 'I hoped it would never come to shooting them'," from France 24, July 3:

The Basij militia has been blamed for extreme brutality in the violent aftermath of the contested June 12 election in Iran. A Basij commander, who volunteers for one of the Tehran branch of the militia, describes his account of one the bloodiest clashes, on June 20.

Iran's Basij militia is a pro-government volunteer force which comes to the aid of the regime when unrest hits the streets. It was established by Ayatollah Khomeini in 1979 during the Iran-Iraq war. During the last three weeks the Basij has been called upon by the government to quell the post-election protests, in which at least 20 people were reported to have been killed. The opposition says the figure is much higher.

Mehdi (not his real name) is a 39-year-old Basij commander and a former classmate of one of our Observers from Tehran (who prefers not to be mentioned). Mehdi led a mission in the city centre, close to the Tehran military base, on June 20, one of the most violent days of the clashes.

I did shoot at people myself. I am a military man I have to obey my orders. The crowd was attacking us like crazy people; throwing stones and Molotov cocktails. We had to protect ourselves; to show we were serious, and we did warn them, shouting several times, before opening fire. But they continued to attack. I don't remember who I shot, I just tried to shoot at the people's feet.

Later, we moved back and went behind the vans in middle of the street and I ordered my unit to shoot into the ground in the hope of scaring the crowds from coming closer.

I hoped it would never come to shooting them. That night, I had a nightmare in which the protestors threw me on a fire. It's come back several times, and I can see the faces of the people I was ordered to shoot. I've asked a very spiritual mullah to pray for me.

I did it for Islam but it wasn't easy to kill people. We have to remember who they are though - they're deceitful people who are against the Islamic Revolution. You can't expect us to stay calm when they want to overthrow our regime."

 

Saturday
04Jul

Sharia Law/Muslim Treatment of Gays 

Muslim youths shout abuse, throw rocks at gay man in...Minneapolis

JihadWatch.com 7-3-9

"If they want sharia, let them have it.” -- Dinesh D'Souza, The Enemy At Home, p. 280

"America and Islam are not exclusive, and need not be in competition. Instead, they overlap, and share common principles – principles of justice and progress; tolerance and the dignity of all human beings." -- Barack Obama, Cairo, June 4, 2009

Rock throwing. So very Sharia-oriented. In Minneapolis. "Harassment Caught on Tape," by Amita Parashar in The Advocate, June 30 (thanks to Womanist Musings):

Approximately 15 youths physically and verbally taunted a gay man as he was leaving Twin Cities Pride in Minneapolis on Saturday, in an incident captured on video.

The Somali youths asked the man if he was gay, and when he responded yes, the young people yelled "I hate gay people" and reportedly threw rocks at the man, whose name is not known.

On the video various youths can be heard saying "I hate gay people" repeatedly, along with "Gay is not the way" and "F*** gay people. They can go f*** each other."...

 


Friday
03Jul

Our beloved Sarah Palin has in a masterstroke stepped down

Dear Reader,

Sarah has stepped down and I wish her well with her future. Sarah will be rich and well rested for whatever she seeks to do. I really don't think there was any other way to stop the "Bush-a-sation" of Sarah.

This was a damned if you do or damned if you don't situation. The fact is apart from dropping from the scene the warped mis-characterization would have been complete in the public mind.

Things to look for.....

  • Massive sympathy and even a stronger devotion from her fans. Remember Hillary was all but destroyed and now she is Sec. of State. Much of Clinton's comeback is due to the massive empathy she received from women everywhere over Bills perversions. Expect Sarah to receive an outpouring of goodwill.
  • Best selling book is on the way
  • Backlash against the media-rape of Sarah and her kids.
Friday
03Jul

Hussein Obama’s Global Warming Hype

Scientists have been opposing the global warming hype

Debunking Obama’s Cap and Trade and Global Warming Myths

By Sher ZieveCanadaFreePress.com 7-2-9

 

As the USA population is now firmly under One-Party rule, it becomes even more essential that the truth is disseminated to the people—for as long as will be allowed. Scientists have been opposing the global warming hype since it was first introduced by the United Nations and, then, former US VP Al Gore.

These scientists were then threatened with the loss of both their jobs and credibility if they continued to speak out against the fraudulent concept; a concept that was brought to bear so that “wealthy” Western populations (most specifically the USA) could be relieved of their money via new and prohibitive taxation.

Obama is now in the process of diligently working to pass the UN-inspired Cap and Trade bill that will make using electricity and other energy sources unattainable for many. In other words, in some cases—due to the projected additional $3,000-4,000/year/family energy costs—there are people who may be reduced to burning wood (or freezing to death) for heat and fanning themselves to cool off. If passed, Cap and Trade will mean that ObamaJustice has finally arrived and the people of the US will suffer and be punished for their sins of prosperity—just as he had planned. However, the ObamaElite will be allowed to reap the harvest of their plunder of the American people.

One group of distinguished scientists is also working diligently—to get the truth out. The group Scientists for Truth is holding a “debunking” conference on 13 August, 2009. Below is my interview with conference organizer and sponsor Ron Boyer.

The Interview

Sher: Ron, would you give my readers a bit of your background?

Ron: With a newly-earned BS degree in chemistry from Missouri State University, I began my career in 1970 with a local air quality control agency, and for more than two decades I managed the air quality division at that agency. I have been involved in clean air programs throughout my lengthy career. Presently I serve on the Missouri Air Conservation Commission, the rule-making body for protection of air resources in Missouri.

I now manage a small consulting company, Surefire Strategies LLC, specializing in environmental and agricultural consulting work.

I consider myself to be an environmentalist. I have worked diligently to adopt and enforce regulations to protect air quality. My wife and I grow vegetables in the garden, maintain a compost bin, recycle paper and metal, and make a conscientious effort to conserve water and energy.

Sher: Ron, the truth that “global warming” or as it’s now being called “climate change” is a hoax perpetrated to heavily tax populations—and most specifically the American people—has been hidden from the world very well. Your group Scientists for Truth seeks to expose this lie. You have a Conference scheduled for August 13th that is planned as a debunking session and you have lined up some very distinguished experts as speakers who will explain the truth about climate change. Will you tell us about the Conference and what led you to organize it?

Ron: Look at my perspective: the earth was in a cooling mode from my year of birth, 1947, until 1975 (28 years), and it has again been cooling for the past 10 years. In other words 38 of my 61 years have been years of global cooling. Is it any wonder I don’t recognize a dangerous warming trend? The mean global temperature is now about where it was at mid-twentieth century.

The UN’s International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) predicates its global warming alarmism almost entirely on computer models. Since when do computer models trump real-time temperature data? Time will resolve almost all scientific debates. It will resolve the global warming debate. Unfortunately, in this case politicians have co-opted the debate to convince an uninformed public we need carbon cap-and-trade to save the planet. The elaborate scheme will collect hundreds of billions of dollars from the un-favored for redistribution to the favored. A few will get rich, but most of us will end up on the un-favored list.

Why the conference? As a scientist, the declaration by global warming alarmists that the debate is over just rubs me wrong. What has happened to the once revered scientific method—the backbone of science? As chief operating officer of Surefire Strategies, I decided to push back with the “Debunking Climate Change Myths” conferences. At the Springfield, Missouri, conference nationally known speakers will present scientific evidence clearly indicating the debate is far from over. In addition to the science, the ramifications of the Waxman-Markey carbon cap-and-trade legislation will be discussed. Conference attendees will have an opportunity to ask questions following each presentation. Attendees with diverse opinions on climate change are welcome, and all opinions will be respected, however, disruptive members of the audience will get to meet our burly bouncer.

Sher: Increasingly Obama’s “Climate Change” Cap and Trade legislation strongly appears to be based on faulty if not outright false science. As an example, within the last week EPA Senior Operations Research Analyst Alan Carlin brought to light information that had been suppressed by those who want the Cap and Trade bill. The EPA had refused to include his factual information and, instead, his supervisor sent him an email that said: “The time for such discussion of fundamental issues has passed for this round. The administrator and the administration has [sic] decided to move forward on endangerment, and your comments do not help the legal or policy case for this decision. I can only see one impact of your comments given where we are in the process, and that would be a very negative impact on our office.” It appears that the data is being manipulated solely to allow Obama to enter a new and huge energy tax on US citizens and allow him and his Administration to gain even more power over Americans. With respect to Obama’s Administration seemingly knowing that their data are based on faulty premises, what do you draw from the statements made by Carlin’s supervisor?

Ron: Mr. Carlin’s future at EPA is very likely in jeopardy. Clearly, president Obama chose EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson and Energy Secretary Steven Chu to ram through a carbon cap-and-trade program—science be damned.

Sher: As the truth about global warming (AKA climate change) becomes better known—that it is merely another way for the power-elite to gut countries and their peoples of their resources, it becomes even more essential that We-the-People become involved. Where can people go to find out more about your upcoming conference and sign up?

Ron: As sponsor and organizer of the “Debunking Climate Change Myths” conference, our company hopes to spread the scientific truth about climate change. Our ultimate goal is to place a stay on carbon cap-and-trade legislation until the scientific debate is settled. The global warming skeptics are at last gaining support and national recognition. That may account for the administration’s frantic efforts to pass cap-and-trade legislation posthaste.

To quote Doug Hoffman, one of our presenters and a prominent skeptic, “Science is marvelous; it never rests and never accepts any simple answer at face value.”

The conference is being held at a very nice convention center, and registration is modestly priced. The conference details and list of speakers can be found at: Scientistsfortruth.com
Sher: Thanks, Ron. We appreciate yours and your colleagues’ time and effort toward attempting to correct this great wrong that is being perpetrated on the American people—if not the world.

Scientists come out against global warming:

1. http://shockandblog.blogspot.com/2006/06/scientists-come-out-against-gores.html
2.
http://www.tulsabeacon.com/?p=462
3.
http://www.capmag.com/article.asp?id=50
4.
Video:
Scientists for Truth information and Conference sign-up:
Meet Alan Carlin:

 

Friday
03Jul

Prez Eligibility Bill

See how many support prez eligibility bill now

Proposed law would require proof of future White House candidates


By Bob Unruh WorldNetDaily.com 7-3-9

U.S. Rep. Marsha Blackburn, a Tennessee Republican, has become the sixth co-sponsor of a proposal by Rep. Bill Posey, R-Fla., that would require documentation of eligibility from presidential candidates.

She has joined Reps. John Campbell, R-Calif.; John R. Carter, R-Texas; John Culberson, R-Texas; Bob Goodlatte, R-Va.; and Randy Neugebauer, R-Texas, in support Posey's H.R. 1503 plan.

The bill's provisions are simple:

"To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require the principal campaign committee of a candidate for election to the office of President to include with the committee's statement of organization a copy of the candidate's birth certificate, together with such other documentation as may be necessary to establish that the candidate meets the qualifications for eligibility to the Office of President under the Constitution."

It also provides:

"Congress finds that under section 5 of article II of the Constitution of the United States, in order to be eligible to serve as President, an individual must be a natural born citizen of the United States who has attained the age of 35 years and has been a resident within the United States for at least 14 years."

The sponsors' goal is to have the bill become effective for the 2012 presidential election, and it now is pending in a committee of the U.S. House of Representatives.

A participant at a forum on a political website noted "average citizens have to have a copy of our birth certificate just to apply for a passport, but the president of the United States doesn't have to show theirs??? This doesn't make sense at all."

Besides the support that is growing in the U.S. House, Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., says he's in favor of both state and federal demands that future presidential candidates have a formal procedure to document their qualifications.

"The bill requires any federal candidates' campaign committee filing with the Federal Election Commission to produce a copy of the candidate's birth certificate," Coburn wrote. "If the bill makes it to the Senate, I will likely support it."

Is there such a thing as an ethical member of Congress? Find out in Sen. Tom Coburn's "Breach of Trust: How Washington Turns Outsiders into Insiders"

WND earlier reported when Posey talked about his idea on a radio program..

"The last election is over," Posey said in the interview. "I don't think that outcome is going to change. Personally, I think it's futile to go there, but looking toward the future I think it would be reckless if we do not do everything we could to eliminate problems like that in the future. And that's why I filed the bill."

His comments came on the Andrea Shea King Show.

"I don't think a Supreme Court would remove a president from office if they heard the case. But ... we should make a good faith effort to make sure that things in the future are as they should be," he said.

The question that prompted the legislative effort now also is being raised on billboards nationwide.

The billboard campaign follows an ongoing petition campaign launched several months ago by WND Editor and Chief Executive Officer Joseph Farah.

They are intended to raise public awareness of the fact that Obama has never released the standard "long-form" birth certificate that would show which hospital he was born in, the attending physician and establish that he truly was born in Hawaii, as his autobiography maintains.

Send a contribution to support the national billboard campaign that asks a simple question: "Where's the birth certificate?"

The "Certification of Live Birth" posted online and widely touted as "Obama's birth certificate" does not in any way prove he was born in Hawaii, since the same "short-form" document is easily obtainable for children not born in Hawaii. The true "long-form" birth certificate – which includes information such as the name of the birth hospital and attending physician – is the only document that can prove Obama was born in Hawaii, but to date he has not permitted its release for public or press scrutiny.

Oddly, though congressional hearings were held to determine whether Sen. John McCain was constitutionally eligible to be president as a "natural born citizen," no controlling legal authority ever sought to verify Obama's claim to a Hawaiian birth.

WND has reported on dozens of legal challenges to Obama's status as a "natural born citizen." The Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."

Some of the lawsuits question whether he was actually born in Hawaii, as he insists. If he was born out of the country, Obama's American mother, the suits contend, was too young at the time of his birth to confer American citizenship to her son under the law at the time.

Other challenges have focused on Obama's citizenship through his father, a Kenyan subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of his birth, thus making him a dual citizen. The cases contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens from qualifying as natural born.

Complicating the situation is Obama's decision to spend sums estimated in the hundreds of thousands of dollars to avoid releasing a state birth certificate that would put to rest all of the questions.

Although Obama officials have told WND all such allegations are "garbage," here is a partial listing and status update for some of the cases over Obama's eligibility:

  • New Jersey attorney Mario Apuzzo has filed a case on behalf of Charles Kerchner and others alleging Congress didn't properly ascertain that Obama is qualified to hold the office of president.
  • Pennsylvania Democrat Philip Berg has three cases pending, including Berg vs. Obama in the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, a separate Berg vs. Obama challenging Obama's eligibility to be a U.S. senator and Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama, (now dismissed) brought on behalf of a retired military member who could be facing recall to active duty by Obama.
  • Leo Donofrio of New Jersey filed a lawsuit claiming Obama's dual citizenship disqualified him from serving as president. His case was considered in conference by the U.S. Supreme Court but denied a full hearing.
  • Cort Wrotnowski filed suit against Connecticut's secretary of state, making a similar argument to Donofrio. His case was considered in conference by the U.S. Supreme Court, but was denied a full hearing.
  • Former presidential candidate Alan Keyes headlines a list of people filing a suit in California, in a case handled by the United States Justice Foundation, that asks the secretary of state to refuse to allow the state's 55 Electoral College votes to be cast in the 2008 presidential election until Obama verifies his eligibility to hold the office. The case is pending, and lawyers are seeking the public's support.
  • Chicago lawyer Andy Martin sought legal action requiring Hawaii Gov. Linda Lingle to release Obama's vital statistics record. The case was dismissed by Hawaii Circuit Court Judge Bert Ayabe.
  • Lt. Col. Donald Sullivan sought a temporary restraining order to stop the Electoral College vote in North Carolina until Barack Obama's eligibility could be confirmed, alleging doubt about Obama's citizenship. His case was denied.
  • In Ohio, David M. Neal sued to force the secretary of state to request documents from the Federal Elections Commission, the Democratic National Committee, the Ohio Democratic Party and Obama to show the presidential candidate was born in Hawaii. The case was denied.
  • Also in Ohio, there was the Greenberg v. Brunner case which ended when the judge threatened to assess all case costs against the plaintiff.
  • In Washington state, Steven Marquis sued the secretary of state seeking a determination on Obama's citizenship. The case was denied.
  • In Georgia, Rev. Tom Terry asked the state Supreme Court to authenticate Obama's birth certificate. His request for an injunction against Georgia's secretary of state was denied by Georgia Superior Court Judge Jerry W. Baxter.
  • California attorney Orly Taitz has brought a case, Lightfoot vs. Bowen, on behalf of Gail Lightfoot, the vice presidential candidate on the ballot with Ron Paul, four electors and two registered voters. She also has brought forward several other cases and has conducted several public campaigns to generate awareness of the issue.
  • In Texas, Darrel Hunter vs. Obama later was dismissed.
  • In Ohio, Gordon Stamper vs. U.S. later was dismissed.
  • In Texas, Brockhausen vs. Andrade.
  • In Washington, L. Charles Cohen vs. Obama.
  • In Hawaii, Keyes vs. Lingle, dismissed.

In addition, other cases cited on the RightSideofLife blog as raising questions about Obama's eligibility include:

  • In Texas, Darrel Hunter vs. Obama later was dismissed.
  • In Ohio, Gordon Stamper vs. U.S. later was dismissed.
  • In Texas, Brockhausen vs. Andrade.
  • In Washington, L. Charles Cohen vs. Obama.

WND has reported that among the documentation not yet available for Obama includes his kindergarten records, his Punahou school records, his Occidental College records, his Columbia University records, his Columbia thesis, his Harvard Law School records, his Harvard Law Review articles, his scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, his passport, his medical records, his files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records, and his adoption records.

Your donation – from as little as $5 to as much as $1,000 – can be made online at the WND SuperStore. (Donations are not tax-deductible. Donations of amounts greater than $1,000 can be arranged by calling either 541-474-1776 or 1-800-4WND.COM. If you would prefer to mail in your contributions, they should be directed to WND, P.O. Box 1627, Medford, Oregon, 97501. Be sure to specify the purpose of the donation by writing "billboard" on the check. In addition, donations of billboard space will be accepted, as will significant contributions specifically targeted for geographic locations.)

If you are a member of the media and would like to interview Joseph Farah about this campaign, e-mail WND.

 

Friday
03Jul

Sheik Rick Warren 

Rick Warren does it, again

Joseph Farah WorldNetDaily.com 7-3-9

While millions of other Americans will be celebrating Independence Day weekend, Rick Warren, often called "America's Pastor," will be serving as the keynote speaker for a Saudi-backed Muslim group that promotes a radical strain of Wahhabi Islam in about 80 percent of U.S. mosques.

I don't know about you, but I'm getting tired of Rick Warren's bad judgments.

This time Warren will be schmoozing with the Islamic Society of North America, an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood – just as are al-Qaida, Hamas and most other Muslim terrorist organizations.

ISNA puts on a façade of moderation, yet, according to terrorism expert Steven Emerson, it "convenes annual conferences where Islamist militants have been given a platform to incite violence and promote hatred."

After Hamas leader Mousa Marzook was arrested in 1997, ISNA raised money for his defense. He was eventually deported.

ISNA condemned the U.S. government's seizure of the financial assets of Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad after Sept. 11.

Brigitte Gabriel combats politically correct notions about the "religion of peace" in "They Must be Stopped: Why We Must Defeat Radical Islam and How we Can Do It"

"I think ISNA has been an umbrella, also a promoter of groups that have been involved in terrorism," explains Emerson. "I am not going to accuse the ISNA of being directly involved in terrorism. I will say ISNA has sponsored extremists, racists, people who call for jihadagainst the United States."

I could go on with many more details about ISNA. Suffice it to say it is no friend of Christianity and no friend of America.

So what is Rick Warren doing speaking at the group's national conference?

I don't know what Warren's agenda is. He would probably say he doesn't have one. But I can tell you the effect of his appearance – it is designed to disinfect and rehabilitate a group that is dangerous and subversive to U.S. national security.

But it should surprise no one, at this point, that Rick Warren will be there. One of the first times I ever wrote about Rick Warren was in 2006 when he took an equally misguided trip to Syria to meet with dictator Bashar Assad and praise him for his pleasant treatment of Christians. Syria was then and remains today one of the world's leading state sponsors of Islamic terrorism. Almost every terrorist group in the world maintains offices there. Nevertheless, Rick Warren said, while in Syria, that the country "does not allow extremism of any kind."

Less than a week after Warren's absurd proclamations in Syria, a Christian leader in Lebanon, former President Pierre Gemayel, was assassinated in the streets of Beirut. Everyone in Lebanon knows who killed him – the Syrian government.

As I wrote at the time, "it is imperative that Christians – and especially Christian leaders – have discernment about evil in our world. And true, unadulterated evil is what you have running Syria today. The government led by Bashar Assad, who met with Rick Warren last week, is anti-American, anti-freedom, anti-Christian, anti-Jewish and pro-terrorist.

"Rick Warren should know this. Yet, he has placed himself in a position of apologizing and excusing the government in Damascus, one of the most evil on the face of the earth.

"It is not an exaggeration to say that government got cover last week as a result of Warren's shameful public relations on its behalf. I won't go so far to say there was a direct cause-and-effect relationship between Warren's embrace of Assad and the assassination of Gemayel yesterday, but it is both a coincidence of striking proportions as well as an illustration of the true character of Damascus' totalitarian police-state regime."

In 2007, Rick Warren was one of 100 or so "evangelical leaders" who signed a document begging forgiveness from Muslims for all the evil deeds perpetrated against them by Christians.

Rick Warren loves to apologize for things he didn't do, for things other people did that weren't wrong, even for things that occurred hundreds of years before he was born – such as apologizing to Muslims worldwide for atrocities committed against their ancestors during the Crusades.

In 2007, he also apologized for American "excesses in the war on terrorism."

And he has apologized for the church because it hasn't done enough about the spread of AIDS and problems like global warming.

Yet, I must observe that despite his predilection for apologies, he has a great deal of trouble owning up to his own personal mistakes.

Once again, just like his trip to Syria, serving as the keynote speaker to the Islamic Society of North America is a very, very bad personal mistake – one that demonstrates a complete lack of spiritual discernment.

 

 

Friday
03Jul

Comrade Hussein Obama

None dare call it Marxism

WorldNetDaily.com 7-3-9

All right already. I won't call Obama a Marxist in this column. Instead, I'll point to some signs that indicate that Barack and Karl might well be soul mates. At least, they have similar attitudes about capital, labor and profits, er, surplus value.

Liberals, even those of the Marxist variety, take umbrage when you point out their ideological kinship with Marxism.

I suppose this dates back to the days when being a communist was tantamount to being an enemy of the United States, in that there was a global communist movement intent on – and coming darn close to – world domination. Though global communism has been defeated, there remains a strong contingent among us, whose nerve center is the Democratic Party leadership under President Obama, committed to obliterating America's free market.

Without getting into the intricacies of Marxist theory, suffice it to say that at the core of this political and economic philosophy is a belief in the historical class struggle. The capitalist (bourgeois) exploits the industrial worker (proletarian) by underpaying him and adding on unnecessary charges to the prices of goods and services, driving up costs to the consumer, and pocketing the profits.

Are we witnessing the return of Karl Marx, or at least his anti-capitalist ideology? Compare today's developments with Marx's classic, "Das Kapital"

In "Basic Economics," Thomas Sowell puts it this way: "Profits may be the most misconceived subject in economics. Socialists have long regarded profits as simply 'overcharge,' as Fabian socialist George Bernard Shaw called it, or a 'surplus value' as Karl Marx called it." The theory is that under socialism or Marxism, these surplus charges would be eliminated and goods and services would become more affordable.

But in reality, socialism doesn't make goods and services more affordable, but less so. As Dr. Sowell explains: "The hope for profits and the threat of losses is what forces a business owner in a capitalist economy to produce at the lowest cost and sell what the customers are most willing to pay for. ... Under socialism (there is) far less incentive to be as efficient ... much less to keep up with changing conditions and respond to them quickly." With less incentive for efficiencies and cost control, the prices of goods might well be higher.

Profits are not arbitrary charges added on to the costs of producing goods and services; nor are they attributable to artificially high prices charged by those motivated by greed. Indeed, writes Sowell, most of the great fortunes in American history were amassed when entrepreneurs were able to reduce costs and charge lower prices and to increase their volume sales to mass markets.

You get the point. Capitalists don't view profits as evil or the product of greed. Their opponents – call them Marxists, fascists, socialists, radical liberals or whatever – do. Which brings us back to Barack Obama.

Both his father, Barack Obama Sr., and his mentor, Frank Marshall Davis, were communists. His church of choice was one of black liberation theology, whose Marxist roots are inarguable. He associated with far leftists on the "organizing" streets of Chicago, including Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn.

Mentorship and associations are one thing, but what have Obama's words and actions revealed about his attitudes toward labor, capital, profits and government control of business and industry?

Well, he said that he would raise capital gains tax rates, even if it reduced revenues, as a matter of fairness. It's only fair to make everyone poorer if you believe profits are inherently evil.

He told Joe the Plumber he wants to spread the wealth around. He talked about confiscating Exxon Mobil's profits and giving them to consumers, saying, "They are not going to give up those profits easily." He called Chrysler creditors "speculators" and castigated them for refusing to accept his extortionist reorganization plan. He berated Wall Street for making profits, saying, "Now is not (the) time" for them to "rake in profits." He and his wife even railed against the pursuit of profit in their respective commencement addresses.

He abused the power of his office to steal money from GM and Chrysler shareholders and transfer it to the proletariat, I mean, the United Auto Workers. He redistributed taxpayer money from those who have paid their mortgages to those who have not.

He is desperately trying to spread the misery and impoverish businesses and individuals through his cap and tax plan, which no proponent of economic growth and prosperity would consider supporting. And in addition to gobbling up other businesses and industries, he is trying to nationalize medicine – to siphon off the evil surplus value charged by doctors and insurance companies – on the flawed Marxist theory that he can reduce costs overall, when the reason health care costs have already skyrocketed is that market forces have been suppressed in the industry.

You don't have to call him a Marxist, but at least understand where his heart is.

 

 

Friday
03Jul

Hussein Obama's Non-Recovery 

Hussein Obama, where’s The Recovery?

Today’s announcement that the unemployment rate has hit a 26-year high is crushing news to millions of Americans desperately in need of employment and to those hoping that “change” was on the way. The administration promised us that the stimulus plan would hold the line on unemployment. In fact, we were told that if lawmakers didn’t waste time trying to read the bill and just voted “yes,” unemployment would go no higher than 8%. Today it stands at 9.5%, and even Obama now concedes it will hit double digi ts.

Twenty-six years ago, the nation was mired in a deep recession, much worse than the one we are facing today. How did we get out of it? Back then President Ronald Reagan slashed taxes and did his best to reduce spending. The world marveled at the Reagan Recovery. Today, Barack Obama is spending money we don’t have on things we don’t need. He’s also promising to raise taxes through the roof to create new programs we can’t afford. In short, he’s doing the exact opposite of what worked for Ronald Reagan, and putting America on the fast track to the “Barack Bankruptcy.”

 

Friday
03Jul

Canada Day vs Canadian Arab Federation

Europe Is Growing Skeptical Of Dialogue With Muslims

Canadian Arab Federation exec: "F--- Canada Day"

JihadWatch.com 7-3-9

Islam transcends nationality. Traditional Islam teaches that Muslims should respect only their allegiance to the umma, not to the nation-state in which they live. "Arab group exec quits after online tirade," by Brett Clarkson and Joe Warmington for the Toronto Sun, July 2 (thanks to M.):

The Canadian Arab Federation moved to distance itself from one of its own executives who resigned yesterday after he apparently posted "F--- Canada Day" on his Facebook page, called Canada a "genocidal state," and said he "couldn't be more ashamed to be Canadian."

The tirade on Omar Shaban's profile stirred up a firestorm of controversy and put CAF leaders in damage-control mode as they were quick to condemn the posting on the social networking site.

Just after 8:30 last night, Shaban, 23, resigned his post as the CAF's executive vice-president for Western Canada, CAF national president Khaled Mouammar confirmed.

"There was a big outcry from our member organizations and it was felt that he had to correct that," Mouammar said. "He decided that the best thing for him to do was to resign."

'Ashamed'

Shaban didn't return requests from the Sun for interviews and to verify that the comments on his personal Facebook status update were indeed his writings. But his Facebook page spoke volumes.

"It's finally Canada Day ... Couldn't be more ashamed to be Canadian," he wrote, apparently in reference to Canada's treatment of the native population.

 

 

Friday
03Jul

American Dhimmitude

Sorry doesn't cut it

Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Dhimmitude
By: Faith J. H. McDonnell
Thursday, July 02, 2009

 


Welcome to the convention of the Islamic Society of North America.

This weekend, as America celebrates its 233rd birthday, the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), an unindicted co-conspirator in the U.S. vs. Holy Land Foundation prosecution, is celebrating “Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.” Yes, the inalienable rights our Declaration of Independence calls “self-evident” are the theme of the Muslim Brotherhood-associated organization’s 46th annual convention, in Washington,

DC, July 3-6, 2009.

 

 

Certainly, understanding life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness as Islamic values requires creativity. No problem there. Most non-Muslims, including influential and well-respected church leaders, seem to be in an ongoing state of suspension of disbelief, as well as suspension of belief, concerning Islam. This weekend ISNA’s convention will give some Christian leaders the opportunity to display the same sort of appeasement and dhimmitude that frequently accompanies Christian-Muslim dialogue.

Hundreds of invited speakers will unpack the convention theme. One “sought after” speaker is the Artist Formerly Known as Cat Stevens. After his conversion to Islam, Stevens, now Yusuf Islam, joined the Ayatollah Khomeini in making author Salman Rushdie feel somewhat “sought after.” Allegedly defaming Islam obviously disqualified Rushdie to the right to life, so there go liberty and happiness. Islam (the man of peace, not the religion of peace) later qualified his call for Rushdie’s death, assuring the world that he did not want vigilante justice. He wanted a proper Islamic court trial, ending, as Islamic trials so frequently do, in execution.

 

Another honored guest of the convention is Senegal’s President, Abdoulaye Wade. Wade is the chairman of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), that great bastion of human rights. The OIC is most recently known for promoting the “Defamation of Religions” resolution in the UN Commission on Human Rights. The resolution’s goal is to outlaw all criticism of Islam. Wade recently condemned the indictment of Sudan President Omar el Bashir for crimes against humanity by the International Criminal Court. Wade, ever concerned about the life, liberty, and happiness of the Darfurians, assures the ICC that there is no genocide in Sudan.

 

A speaker in the convention’s main session is American Muslim scholar Sheikh Hamza Yusuf. Yusuf has not exactly been known for wishing America life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Among his anti-American and anti-Semitic statements, in an April 2003 FrontPage Magazine article, anonymous UCLA students reported Yusuf’s remarks at a September 9, 2001 benefit dinner for convicted cop-killer Imam Jamil Al-Amin (H. Rap Brown). Because America had been “ungrateful for the bounties of Allah” it was “facing a very terrible fate,” said Yusuf. He warned that America had “a great tribulation coming to it,” and scoffed that people were “too illiterate to read the writing on the wall.” After September 11, Yusuf himself just may have proved the U.S. government’s inability to read the writing on the wall. After moderating his own inflammatory rhetoric, he met with and became an “advisor” on Islam to President George W. Bush.

 

Joining Yusuf and ISNA president Dr. Ingrid Mattson to speak at the convention’s keynote is Rick Warren, the best-selling author who is founder and senior pastor of Saddleback Church in California. Warren and Mattson were both participants in Barack Obama’s inauguration. And ISNA’s National Director for Interfaith and Community Outreach (Our Man in the Dar al-Harb), Dr. Sayyid M. Syeed, spoke last December at Saddleback Church’s Civil Forum on Public Health.

 

Several mainline church leaders such as Presiding Bishop of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America, Mark Hanson, and former member of Congress and general secretary of the National Council of Churches, Bob Edgar, will also speak at the convention. But by far the biggest gaggle of Christian dhimmis will be at the convention’s “Interfaith Unity Reception.” The gathering’s theme, A Common Word Between Us and You, refers to the warm and fuzzy letter sent by 138 Muslim clerics and scholars from around the world to Pope Benedict XVI and other Christian leaders in October 2007 inviting Christians to peace with Islam. Hundreds of Christian leaders (not including Benedict XVI) rushed to prostrate themselves before their Muslim pen pals with an obsequious reply. Their reply, Loving God and Neighbor Together: A Christian Response to A Common Word Between Us and You sets the standard, the double standard, that will most probably be adhered to by Christians at ISNA’s interfaith unity reception.

 

Loving God and Neighbor Together was the product of Yale Divinity School theologians Miroslav Volf (who will participate in the convention), Joseph Cumming, Harold Attridge, and Emilie Townes. But these scholars approached Islam either with the uncritical eyes of those more familiar with the theoretical realm and not the reality of life under Shari’a, or else their passion for Christian-Muslim reconciliation overwhelmed any need for truth. The mistaken approach to Christian-Muslim dialogue in Loving God and Neighbor Together should not be repeated by Christians participating in ISNA’s gathering.

 

Loving God and Neighbor Together packs a double dose of the dhimmitude so often present in Christian-Muslim dialogue. It demonstrates both naiveté about Islam’s agenda and a disturbing willingness to compromise Christian doctrine. According to Islam expert the Rev. Dr. Mark Durie, Loving God and Neighbor Together was naïve because Christians entered “an Islamicized dialogue” set forth by A Common Word in which the tenets of Islam are the premise for all conversation. For instance, to Christians, “the love of God” is the unconditional love that God has for the human race. But “the love of God” in A Common Word, as in Islam itself, refers to God’s favor on those who submit to him.

 

The Christians compromise Christian doctrine, says the Rev. Dr. Patrick Sookhdeo of the Barnabas Fund. He notes the Yale letter refers to “the Prophet Muhammad,” an appellation sure to be uttered in reverent tones by Christians at the ISNA conference. Do they “really accept Muhammad as a true prophet of God?” Sookhdeo inquires. “If so . . . they should be Muslims. . . It would be wrong to give Muslims the impression that Christians accept his status as a true prophet of God,” Sookhdeo advises.

 

In their eagerness to find common ground with the Muslims the Christians marginalize themselves. Sookhdeo says that “the tone of the Muslim letter is condescending, given from a position of superiority and strength,” while the Yale response is “one of abject humility, guilt, and subjugation.” He says that this “self-humbling, grateful tone” fits the “classical Islamic understanding of the role of Christians as dhimmis in the Islamic state.”

 

In the preamble, the Yale responders confess the need to remove an enormous log in their own eyes before dealing with the speck in their neighbor Muslims’ eyes (a reference to Matthew 7: 5). They ask for forgiveness from God, referring to Him by the Muslim-wannabe name “the All-Merciful One,” and from the Muslim community around the world “because in the past (e.g. in the Crusades) and in the present (e.g. in excesses of the “war on terror”) many Christians have been guilty of sinning against our Muslim neighbors,” the Yale letter confesses.

 

Unfortunately, Loving God and Neighbor Together is so preoccupied with groveling that it never gets around to commenting on the little “specks” of offense that followers of Islam commit against their Christian neighbors. Such specks as slavery, wide-scale persecution, slaughter of Christians, Jews, Hindus, and others in the Islamic world, and flying airplanes into buildings come to mind.

 

One of the most appalling aspects of Loving God and Neighbor Together is its failure to be a voice on behalf of Christians, Jews, and others (A Common Word barely mentioned any other religions since they are not “People of the Book”). The late Rev. Richard John Neuhaus once said of similar appeasement practices by the churches during the Cold War years, “We start telling lies about countries where people are being imprisoned and tortured and slaughtered . . . we paint a rosy picture of this, and pretend it isn’t happening.” He continued, “Our religious dignitaries consort with the persecutors. . . This discredits the Church as social witness; it undermines any elementary notion of justice.”

 

Perhaps the best advice for the Christians participating in the ISNA convention this weekend comes from Rick Warren himself. He recently said that as a Christian who believes that all people have been created in the image of their Creator, he must accept them, but not approve of everything that they do. Gestures by Christians such as Loving God and Neighbor Together smack strongly of approval and leave no room to speak the truth in love to Muslims. At the same time they betray those who have been victimized by Islam. This weekend as ISNA convention goers celebrate life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, let’s hope that one of the Christians who attends the convention urges them to recognize those same inalienable rights belong to non-Muslims as well.